Health Insurance and Retirement Bonus

Regular readers will be aware that my contract at the university I was working at finished at the end of March. I was supposed to be unemployed/retired now, but due to a series of unfortunate events will instead be helping my wife with her language school (and getting a small salary) for the rest of the year.

I haven’t had much to do with the university since I cleaned out my office and returned the key, but there have been some minor paperwork issues I had to deal with.

Health Insurance

Perhaps the most important was that I chose to stay on the kyosai health insurance. This is an option for many employees, and involves the employer keeping them on shakai hoken health insurance for up to two years after leaving employment. Employees who choose to do this become responsible for paying both the employer portion of the insurance as well as the employee portion. Basically this means that the cost of their health insurance will roughly double compared to when they were working.

So why do it?

Well, because for most people, paying double what they did as an employee will still be cheaper than paying kokumin kenkou hoken. This is based on your income from the previous year, and in my case at least would have been almost 50% more expensive (my new monthly health insurance cost is just over 40,000 yen now -used to be just over 20,000- but kokumin health insurance would have been over 60,000 yen!). So it is well worth doing, at least for the first year.

Once I reach the second year, I will check to see if my reduced income this year makes kokumin kenkou hoken a better deal -if so I will then switch from the kyosai, but if the kyosai continues to be cheaper I will stay on it for the second year.

Retirement Bonus

I also got a much more pleasant piece of paperwork this week: the statement detailing my retirement bonus.

I worked full time at the university for 13 years, so qualify for a retirement bonus (taishoku teate) upon completion of my contract.

Based on my reading of the retirement bonus tables and how the bonus is calculated (base salary multiplied by a number based on years of service, modified by whether you finished your contract or left before the end, etc.), I had been expecting to receive just over 5 million yen, so imagine my surprise when I opened the envelope and saw this:

I have no idea where that number came from, and I am kind of expecting them to contact me saying it was a mistake and could I please return the extra two million yen…

But assuming it is not a mistake, I was very pleasantly surprised by how little the bonus was taxed.

Let’s jump into the numbers and see why that is.

Retirement bonuses (as well as certain vehicles like iDeCo) qualify for the retirement bonus allowance tax break. That works as follows: first you build up your tax free allowance (400,000 yen a year for the first 20 years, then 700,000 yen a year for the next 10 years, for a maximum tax-free allowance of 15 million yen).

In my case, my tax free allowance after 13 years is 5.2 million (400,000 yen per year x 13 years).

This is applied to the retirement bonus (or the contents of the iDeCo account), then for any amount over that, half of the remainder is taxable (the other half is tax free). So in my case 7.247m – 5.2m tax-free allowance = 2.247m, half of which is then tax-free, leaving 1.123m subject to tax.

This is taxed as income, but is not added to any other income you have, so is taxed at a very low rate (as you can see on the slip above). Approximate 5% in income tax, and 10% in local inhabitant’s tax (split between the city and the prefecture, as Sendai is big enough to be an independent political entity).

Unemployment Insurance

Because I will be helping my wife, I was not able to claim unemployment insurance this time. If I had been able to, I would have qualified to receive around 60% of my salary for around seven months. Not too shabby!

This is something you can do when you finish working as long as your employer has been paying koyou hoken on your behalf, so it is worth factoring into any calculations.

And that is my experience of retirement (so far). I’ll keep you posted as to whether they ask me to pay back some of that amount.

9 Responses

  1. “…as long as your employer has been paying koyou hoken on your behalf…”

    Employment insurance was a mandatory deduction listed on my payslips–not paid by my employer, certainly not something that I could’ve opted out of. Is this somehow different for public uni (or case by case)?

  2. Good points being raised re: employment insurance.

    As a rule, civil servants aren’t covered by the employment-insurance law, but exceptions exist in the case of (partly) corporatized entities like Japan Post and national universities, the employees of which are technically not classified as koumuin. Rather serendipitously, the union at Tohoku University published a table listing the changes in working conditions there brought about by the corporatization law, including the change in employment status (mibun). The table can be viewed and downloaded here:
    https://tohokudai-kumiai.org/docs05/rj05.html

    It’s also true that while employment-insurance premiums are mandatory for all relevant businesses, the cost of premiums is shared by the employer. In fact, the employer pays the lion’s share of employment-insurance premiums. What appears on the payslip is the employee’s share.

    For “general work” (ippan jigyō), the rate used to calculate premiums from April 2022 is 9.5/1000 of applicable employee remuneration, of which the employee pays 3/1000 and the employer pays 6.5/1000. From October, the rates will increase for both employee (to 5/1000) and employer (to 8.5/1000), for a total rate of 13.5/1000.

    The relevant MHLW tables can be downloaded here:
    https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000921550.pdf

    A pretty thorough explanation of the system is given here (based on last year’s rates):
    https://www.freee.co.jp/kb/kb-payroll/how-to-calculate-employment-insurance/

  3. My understanding is that you can’t claim unemployment insurance if you don’t intend on working full time; is this correct?

    1. When I was unemployed 6 or 7 years ago, I went to HalloWork, and told them I was looking for full-time work, while I was working part-time. I had to go to HalloWork once or twice a month (can’t remember) to spend 1 hour on their computer system “looking for work”. At the same time, whenever I applied for a full-time teaching position I told HalloWork about it and if I had gotten an interview. So long as you are cheerful and “looking for work” you should be able to get some financial support.

  4. Congratulations on the yennies and extras too.
    I’m just wondering, why didn’t you go for unemployment instead of helping your wife fully outright? Isn’t that leaving yennies on the table?

    1. No choice -she needed help and I am not in a position to say no 😉

  5. Have you gone to HalloWork to confirm that you do not qualify for any Unemployment Subsidy? When I was unemployed 6 or 7 years ago, I received a partial subsidy despite working part-time. At that time the rule was that if you worked 4 hours or less, you could receive a partial subsidy for that day. On 4 days each week I only taught 2 ninety-minute classes. So for those days I would get a half-day subsidy. One day a week I taught 3 ninety-minute classes, so I got nothing for those days. I got a full subsidy for days that are holidays (like Golden Week) and I would not work at all. This went on for months and was nice “free money” (although I had paid Unemployment Insurance premiums for years).